Performance evaluation of cassava genotypes (Manihot Esculenta Crantz) at Gamo Zone, South Ethiopia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25081/jsa.2025.v9.9690Keywords:
Cassava, Genotypes, Varieties, Root yield, Yield-related parametersAbstract
Five cassava genotypes were evaluated over two consecutive years at two sites in the Gamo zone of the South Ethiopia Region to assess their overall root yield and identify the best-performing varieties. The experiment was arranged using a Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications. The F-test was carried out to examine the consistency of error variances, revealing that the error variances were not homogeneous; therefore, we analyzed the data separately for each site. The analysis of variance conducted over two years at the Dembile Otora site revealed significant differences between genotypes concerning yield and related parameters, with the exceptions being stem girths and root girth, where varieties showed notable differences, and stand count at harvest, which did not exhibit significant variation among varieties. The varieties Hawassa 4 and Chichu produced the highest total root yields per hectare, achieving 61.25 and 54.48 tons per hectare, respectively. In contrast, the variety Qulle produced the lowest total root yield per hectare, measuring 39.71 tons per hectare. The analysis of variance conducted over two years at the Fudale site revealed significant differences among genotypes regarding yield and related parameters, except stand count at harvest, where varieties exhibited significant differences. The variety Hawassa 4 had the highest total root yield per hectare (51.95 tons), followed closely by Chichu (43.66 tons). Hawassa 4 and Chichu had yield advantages of 55% and 30% respectively, over the local check, while the varieties Kello and Qulle showed no yield advantage compared to the local check. The findings indicate that both Hawassa 4 and Chichu achieved superior root yields relative to the local check at both tested sites. Consequently, these varieties are suggested for pre-extension demonstration within the area and similar agro-ecological zones.
Downloads
References
Abaca, A., Odama, E., Komakech, A., Asiku, B., Andrews, A. A., & Kassim, S. (2021). Evaluation of Newly Released Cassava Varieties for Yield Performance, Reactions to Cassava Diseases and Farmers’ Preference in Adjumani District of Uganda. Journal of Agricultural Science, 13(4), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v13n4p84
Enete, A. A. (2009). Middlemen and smallholder farmers in cassava marketing in Africa. Tropicultura, 27(1), 40-44.
FAOSTAT. (2013). Statistical data base of the food and agricultural organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://faostat.org
Howeler, R. H. (2012). Recent trends in production and utilization of cassava in Asia. In R. H. Howeler (Ed.), The Cassava Handbook. A Reference Manual Based on the Asian Regional Cassava Training Course Held in Thailand (pp. 1-22). Bangkok, Thailand: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT).
Howeler, R., Lutaladio, N., & Thomas, G. (2013). Save and Grow: Cassava. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
SNNPR BoA. (2014). Basic Agricultural Information Planning and programming Service, Hawassa, Ethiopia. Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region, Bureau of Agriculture. Unpublished row data.
Tadesse, T., Bekele, A., Tsegaye, E., Michael, G. W., Mulualem, T., Beshir, W., & Mesele, G. (2017). Performance of cassava (Manihot esculanta. Cratz) clones in potential and low moisture stressed areas of Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(20), 1738-1746. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11365
Tadesse, T., Degu, G., Shonga, E., Mekonen, S., Addis, T., & Yakob, B. (2013). Current status, Potentials and challenges of Cassava production, processing, marketing and utilization: Evidence from Southern Ethiopia. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(4), 262-270.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Kanko Chuntale Chunlda, Faso Fano Dalo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


.