The response of safflower genotypes to drought stress induced at the rosette stage

Authors

  • Marang Mosupiemang Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Private Bag 0027, Gaborone, Botswana
  • Vallantino Emongor Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Private Bag 0027, Gaborone, Botswana
  • Goitseone Malambane Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Private Bag 0027, Gaborone, Botswana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25081/jaa.2025.v11.9121

Keywords:

Safflower, Dought stress, GT biplots, Proline, Ascorbate peroxidase

Abstract

Drought stress impact fuelled by climate change is becoming a global concern as it threatens food security in many arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs). However, planting drought-tolerant crops such as safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), in the ASALs can help ensure food security and sustainability. Greenhouse and field experiments were conducted during the 2021/2022 planting season to evaluate the response of safflower genotypes to drought stress. Factors under study were stress conditions and five safflower genotypes. The results revealed that drought stress reduced the chlorophyll content, leaf relative water content (LRWC), and plant height while the activities of ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and proline content increased. This trend was observed at different stress durations under both experiments with the effects being more noticeable when stress duration increases from 10 to 30 days. To rank genotypes based on their overall superiority, the genotype by trait (GT) biplot analysis was employed based on the mean values of all studied traits for five safflower genotypes stressed for 30 days. The results showed that genotype Kenya9819 was overall superior (drought tolerant) while Gila and Turkey ranked poorly (drought sensitive). This suggested that different safflower genotypes have different degrees of tolerance to drought stress depending on the duration of stress.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aeini, M., Abad, H. H. S., Yousefidad, M., Heravan, I. M., & Madani, H. (2018). Effect of seed priming on morphological and biochemical characteristics of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under drought stress. Crop Research, 53(1and2), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-1761.2018.00007.4

Amini, H., Arzani, A., & Bahrami, F. (2013). Seed yield and some physiological traits of safflower as affected by water deficit stress. International Journal of Plant Production, 7(3), 597-614.

Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. A., & Teare, I. D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39, 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060

Bahadori, F., Bijanzadeh, E., Naderi, R., Seehausen, M. L., & Weyl, P. (2025). Planting date affects biochemical characteristics, assimilate remobilization, and yield of safflower under water stress. Scientific Reports, 15, 15318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98827-x

Bortolheiro, F. P. A., & Silva, M. A. (2017). Physiological response and productivity of safflower lines under water deficit and rehydration. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, 89(4), 3051-3066. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720170475

Canavar, Ö., Götz, K.-P., Koca, Y. O., & Ellmer, F. (2014). Relationship between water use efficiency and δ13C isotope discrimination of safflower (Carthamus tinctotius L.) under drought stress. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 19(2), 203-211.

Chavoushi, M., Najafi, F., Salimi, A., & Angaji, S. A. (2019). Improvement in drought stress tolerance of safflower during vegetative growth by exogenous application of salicylic acid and sodium nitroprusside. Industrial Crops and Products, 134, 168-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.03.071

Chen, H., Song, L., Zhou, H., Yao, T., Zhang, Z., Zhang, H., Meng, L., & Zhang, H. (2025). ABA signal transduction and ROS metabolic balance play a key role in the drought resistance of safflower. Plant Growth Regulation, 105(1), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-024-01273-4

Çulha Erdal, Ş., Eyidoğan, F., & Ekmekçi, Y. (2021). Comparative physiological and proteomic analysis of cultivated and wild safflower response to drought stress and re-watering. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 27(2), 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-021-00934-2

Farooq, A., Bukhari, S. A., Akram, N. A., Ashraf, M., Wijaya, L., Alyemeni, M. N., & Ahmad, P. (2020). Exogenously applied ascorbic acid-mediated changes in osmoprotection and oxidative defense system enhanced water stress tolerance in different cultivars of safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.). Plants, 9(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9010104

Gill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48(12), 909-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016

Gültaş, H. T. (2025). Crop water stress index assessment of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under limited water conditions. Scientia Agricola, 82, e20230285. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2023-0285

Hussain, S., Qadir, T., Khaliq, A., Ashraf, U., Parveen, A., Saqib, M., & Rafiq, M. (2019). Drought stress in plants: An overview on implications, tolerance mechanisms and agronomic mitigation strategies. Plant Science Today, 6(4), 389-402. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2018.5.4.408

Joshan, Y., Sani, B., Jabbari, H., Mozafari, H., & Moaveni, P. (2019). Effect of drought stress on oil content and fatty acids composition of some safflower genotypes. Plant, Soil and Environment, 65(11), 563-567. https://doi.org/10.17221/591/2019-PSE

Khan, A. A., Wang, Y. F., Akbar, R., & Alhoqail, W. A. (2025). Mechanistic insights and future perspectives of drought stress management in staple crops. Frontiers in Plant Science, 16, 1547452. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1547452

Kazemeini, S. A., Mohamadi, S., & Pirasteh-anosheh, H. (2015). Growth and photosynthesis responses of safflower cultivars to water stress at two developmental stages. Biological Forum - An International Journal, 7(2), 923-929.

Manvelian, J., Weisany, W., Tahir, N. A., Jabbari, H., & Diyanat, M. (2021). Physiological and biochemical response of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars to zinc application under drought stress. Industrial Crops and Products, 172, 114069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114069

Mittler, R., & Poulos, T. L. (2005). Ascorbate peroxidase. In N. Smirnof (Ed.), Antioxidants and Reactive Oxygen Species in Plants (pp. 87-100) New Jersey, US: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470988565

Mohammadi, M., Ghassemi-Golezani, K., Zehtab-Salmasi, S., & Nasrollahzade, S. (2016). Assessment of some physiological traits in spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars under water stress. International Journal of Life Sciences, 10(1), 58-64. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijls.v10i1.14512

Monteoliva, M. I., Guzzo, M. C., & Posada, G. A. (2021). Breeding for drought tolerance by monitoring chlorophyll content. Gene Technology, 10(3), 165. https://doi.org/10.35248/2329-6682.21.10.16

Mosupiemang, M., Erone Emongor, V., & Malambane, G. (2022). A Review of drought tolerance in safflower. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 34(10), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i1030930

Naderi, R., Valizadeh, M., Toorchi, M., & Shakiba, M. R. (2014). Antioxidant enzyme changes in response to osmotic stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedling. Acta Biologica Szegediensis, 58(2), 95-101.

Nakano, Y., & Asada, K. (1981). Hydrogen Peroxide is Scavenged by Ascorbate-specific Peroxidase in Spinach Chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology, 22(5), 867-880. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232

Olivoto, T., & Lúcio, A. D. C. (2020). metan: An R package for multi-environment trial analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(6), 783-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13384

Singh, D., & Laxmi, A. (2015). Transcriptional regulation of drought response: A tortuous network of transcriptional factors. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 895. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00895

Singh, M., Kumar, J., Singh, S., Singh, V. P., & Prasad, S. M. (2015). Roles of osmoprotectants in improving salinity and drought tolerance in plants: a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 14, 407-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-015-9372-8

Slabbert, M. M., & Krüger, G. H. J. (2014). Antioxidant enzyme activity, proline accumulation, leaf area and cell membrane stability in water stressed amaranthus leaves. South African Journal of Botany, 95, 123-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2014.08.008

Tayebi, A., Afshari, H., Farahvash, F., Sinki, J. M., & Nezarat, S. (2012). Effect of drought stress and different planting dates on safflower yield and its components in Tabriz region. Iranian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2(3), 445-453.

Weiss, E. A. (2000). Oilseed crops. (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell Science.

Yan, W., & Frégeau-Reid, J. (2018). Genotype by Yield*Trait (GYT) Biplot: a Novel Approach for Genotype Selection based on Multiple traits. Scientific Journal of Crop Science, 8, 8242. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26688-8

Yang, D., Ni, R., Yang, S., Pu, Y., Qian, M., Yang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2021). Functional characterization of the stipa purpurea p5cs gene under drought stress conditions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(17), 9599. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179599

Yang, X., Lu, M., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., & Chen, S. (2021). Response mechanism of plants to drought stress. Horticulturae, 7(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7030050

Zhang, P., Bai, J., Liu, Y., Meng, Y., Yang, Z., & Liu, T. (2020). Drought resistance of ten ground cover seedling species during roof greening. PLoS One, 15(6), e0220598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220598

Published

20-06-2025

How to Cite

Mosupiemang, M., Emongor, V., & Malambane, G. (2025). The response of safflower genotypes to drought stress induced at the rosette stage. Journal of Aridland Agriculture, 11, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.25081/jaa.2025.v11.9121

Issue

Section

Articles